Prudhomme v. Williams

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Prudhomme v. Williams

45 La. Ann. 484

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMarch 15, 1893

DocketNo. 11,214

StatusPublished

This text of 45 La. Ann. 484 (Prudhomme v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Prudhomme v. Williams, 45 La. Ann. 484 (La. 1893).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Watkins, J.

The defendant and appellee moves to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the appeal bond is wanting in two essential requisites, to-wit: First, in not containing the stipulation of the Code of Practice that appellant shall prosecute her appeal; and, second, in not specifying the amount for which the sureties are bound.

The first of the two foregoing objections was made and sustained in Russ & Hollingsworth vs. Their Creditors, No. 11,189 of the docket [485]*485of this court, decided this day, and on that ground the appeal was dismissed.

Without expressing any opinion upon the second objection, it is sufficient to say that for the reasons therein assigned the motion of the defendant and appellee in this case must be likewise sustained, and the appeal dismissed; and it is so ordered.

Rehearing refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Watkins, J.

The defendant and appellee moves to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the appeal bond is wanting in two essential requisites, to-wit: First, in not containing the stipulation of the Code of Practice that appellant shall prosecute her appeal; and, second, in not specifying the amount for which the sureties are bound.

The first of the two foregoing objections was made and sustained in Russ & Hollingsworth vs. Their Creditors, No. 11,189 of the docket [485]*485of this court, decided this day, and on that ground the appeal was dismissed.

Without expressing any opinion upon the second objection, it is sufficient to say that for the reasons therein assigned the motion of the defendant and appellee in this case must be likewise sustained, and the appeal dismissed; and it is so ordered.

Rehearing refused.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

45 La. Ann. 484, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prudhomme-v-williams-la-1893.