Prudential v. Yingling

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided September 11, 2000·No. 99-3974·Published

Opinion

5(&200(1'(' )25 )8//7(;7 38%/,&$7,21  3UXGHQWLDO6HFXULWLHVHWDOY

(/(&7521,& &,7$7,21  )(' $SS 3 WK &LU

SHUPDQHQWO\ SURKLELWLQJ GHIHQGDQW IURP SXUVXLQJ KHU WLPH )LOH 1DPH DS

EDUUHGFODLPVLQDUELWUDWLRQ 81,7('67$7(6&28572)$33($/6 )257+(6,;7+&,5&8,7 BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB

358'(17,$/ 6(&85,7,(6 ; ,1& '($1 :,77(5  5(<12/'6 ,1&   1R 3ODLQWLIIV&RXQWHU  'HIHQGDQWV$SSHOOHHV !   Y   &$7+(5,1( 0 <,1*/,1*  'HIHQGDQW&RXQWHU   &ODLPDQW$SSHOODQW   1 $SSHDOIURPWKH8QLWHG6WDWHV'LVWULFW&RXUW IRUWKH6RXWKHUQ'LVWULFWRI2KLRDW&LQFLQQDWL 1Rn6DQGUD6%HFNZLWK'LVWULFWsXGJH 6XEPLWWHGsXQH 'HFLGHGDQG)LOHG6HSWHPEHU %HIRUH.(11('<1(/621DQG%$7&+(/'(5 &LUFXLWsXGJHV

  3UXGHQWLDO6HFXULWLHVHWDOY

BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB SUHOLPLQDU\LQMXQFWLRQVKRXOGLVVXHLQWKHHYHQWWKDWWKH&RXUW LVQRWSHUVXDGHGE\WKDWDUJXPHQWl7KHGLVWULFWFRXUWWKHQ &2816(/ UHMHFWHGGHIHQGDQWjVDUJXPHQWRQWKHJURXQGVWKDWWKLV&LUFXLW KDGSUHYLRXVO\UXOHGWKDWGLVWULFWFRXUWVKDYHMXULVGLFWLRQWR 21%5,()5REHUW15DSS%ULDQ0(LVHQEHUJ&$/)(( GHWHUPLQHZKHWKHUFODLPVDUHHOLJLEOHIRUDUELWUDWLRQXQGHU +$/7(5  *5,6:2/' &OHYHODQG 2KLR 0DULD $ 'HO † 0RQDFR'<.(0$*266(77'HWURLW0LFKLJDQ0LFKDHO 1 8QJDU 8/0(5  %(51( &OHYHODQG 2KLR IRU 7KHGLVWULFWFRXUWZDVHVVHQWLDOO\FRUUHFW:KLOHRXU&LUFXLW $SSHOOHHV&DWKHULQH0

DQG ODWHU DW 'HDQ :LWWHU  WKH

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Prudential v. Yingling, (6th Cir. 2000).

Prudential v. Yingling (Prudential v. Yingling) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.