Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance Co. v. Kalesa
This text of 573 So. 2d 838 (Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance Co. v. Kalesa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
We have for review Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance Co. v. Kalesa, 555 So.2d 1262 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989), in which the district court affirmed the trial court’s ruling that Kalesa’s uninsured motorist (UM) coverage could be stacked upon the tortfeasor’s liability coverage even though the UM limits were less than the liability limits. The district court relied on Shelby Mutual Insurance Co. v. Smith, 527 So.2d 830 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988). We have since quashed Shelby and decided the issue adversely to Kalesa. Shelby Mutual Ins. Co. v. Smith, 556 So.2d 393 (Fla.1990). We quash the decision below.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
573 So. 2d 838, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 166, 1991 Fla. LEXIS 217, 1991 WL 16331, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prudential-property-casualty-insurance-co-v-kalesa-fla-1991.