Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance Company v. Gisler

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance Company v. Gisler

806 A.2d 854, 569 Pa. 573, 2002 Pa. LEXIS 1853

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided September 5, 2002·No. Appeal 31 EAL 2001·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 5th day of September, 2002, the judgment of the Superior Court entered December 22, 2000, is hereby REVERSED based upon this Court’s decision in Burstein v. Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance Company, 2002 WL 1575094 (2002), holding that the regularly used, non-owned car exclusion contained in petitioner’s automobile insur *574 anee policy comports with the underlying policies of the Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law, 75 Pa.C.S. § 1701 et seq.

Justice SAYLOR dissents, as he would remand to the Superior Court for reconsideration in light of Burstein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 5th day of September, 2002, the judgment of the Superior Court entered December 22, 2000, is hereby REVERSED based upon this Court’s decision in Burstein v. Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance Company, 2002 WL 1575094 (2002), holding that the regularly used, non-owned car exclusion contained in petitioner’s automobile insur *574 anee policy comports with the underlying policies of the Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law, 75 Pa.C.S. § 1701 et seq.

Justice SAYLOR dissents, as he would remand to the Superior Court for reconsideration in light of Burstein.

Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance Company v. Gisler, 806 A.2d 854, 569 Pa. 573, 2002 Pa. LEXIS 1853 (Pa. 2002).

Pincite

806 A.2d 854 (Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance Company v. Gisler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related