Prudential Prop. & Cas. Ins. v. LMI Ins.
This text of 678 N.E.2d 579 (Prudential Prop. & Cas. Ins. v. LMI Ins.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Richland App. No. 96-CA-32. On April 24,1997, appellant filed a notice of appeal from a judgment of the Richland County Court of Appeals purportedly entered in case No. 96-CA-32 on March 11,1997, and a memorandum in support of jurisdiction. Attached to appellant’s memorandum is a copy of the judgment entry being appealed, as required by S.Ct.Prac.R. III(1)(D). The judgment entry bears a stamp indicating that it was filed with the clerk of the court of appeals on March 7, 1997. Whereas the date the court of appeals filed its judgment entry for journalization with its clerk is, according to S.Ct.Prac.R. II(2)(A)(1), the date of entry of the judgment being appealed and, whereas appellant did not file its notice of appeal within forty-five days from the date of entry of the judgment being appealed,
IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed as untimely.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
678 N.E.2d 579, 78 Ohio St. 3d 1470, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 1147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prudential-prop-cas-ins-v-lmi-ins-ohio-1997.