Prudential Insurance v. Norton
This text of 103 F. App'x 644 (Prudential Insurance v. Norton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[645]*645MEMORANDUM
The summary judgment of the district court is reversed because the record evidence does not compel the conclusion that Tiffany Duren was authorized to receive Bryan Bacon’s change of beneficiary form on behalf of the uniformed services. The affidavits of Colonel Pritt and Colonel McCrae evidence the contrary. Nor does it establish the authority and role of Mary Ann Fraser.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
103 F. App'x 644, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prudential-insurance-v-norton-ca9-2004.