Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Wade

Fourth Circuit

Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Wade

575 F. App'x 204

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJune 23, 2014

DocketNo. 14-1232

StatusPublished

This text of 575 F. App'x 204 (Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Wade) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Wade, 575 F. App'x 204 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Stacy Edward Wade appeals the district court’s order denying his “Motion for Relief from the District Court’s Order” granting The Prudential Insurance Company of America’s motion for default judgment, motion for deposit, and motion for summary judgment, and granting Defendants Edith and Larry Redden’s motion for summary judgment, and he has filed a motion for a copy of the record at government expense. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Wade’s motion for a copy of the record at government expense and affirm the district court’s order. Prudential Ins. Co. of Am. v. Wade, No. 3:12-cv-00037-JFA (D.S.C. Mar. 6, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Stacy Edward Wade appeals the district court’s order denying his “Motion for Relief from the District Court’s Order” granting The Prudential Insurance Company of America’s motion for default judgment, motion for deposit, and motion for summary judgment, and granting Defendants Edith and Larry Redden’s motion for summary judgment, and he has filed a motion for a copy of the record at government expense. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Wade’s motion for a copy of the record at government expense and affirm the district court’s order. Prudential Ins. Co. of Am. v. Wade, No. 3:12-cv-00037-JFA (D.S.C. Mar. 6, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

575 F. App'x 204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prudential-insurance-co-of-america-v-wade-ca4-2014.