Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. McCarson

285 So. 2d 628, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 6396
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 6, 1973·No. No. 73-216·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See: Adams v. Royal Exchange Assur., Fla.1952, 62 So.2d 591; Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. Winn, 9th Cir. 1934, 71 F.2d 126; Old Republic Insurance Company v. Alexander, 245 Ark. 1029, 436 S.W.2d 829; New York Life Ins. Co. v. Kuhlenschmidt, 218 Ind. 404, 33 N.E.2d 340; Vol. 7, Couch on Insurance, 2nd Ed., § 37:306; Vol. 1, Jones on Evidence, 6th Ed., §§ 4:9, 4:10; Slough, Relevancy Unraveled, 6 Kansas Law Review 38.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. McCarson, 285 So. 2d 628, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 6396 (Fla. Ct. App. 1973).

285 So. 2d 628 (Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. McCarson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Old Republic Insurance Company v. Alexander
436 S.W.2d 829 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1969)
New York Life Insurance v. Kuhlenschmidt
33 N.E.2d 340 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1941)
Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. Winn
71 F.2d 126 (Ninth Circuit, 1934)
Adams v. Royal Exchange Assur.
62 So. 2d 591 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1952)