Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. King

W.D. Missouri

Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. King

308 F. Supp. 1143, 1969 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8933

CourtDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri

DecidedAugust 4, 1969

DocketCiv. A. No. 17099-3

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 308 F. Supp. 1143 (Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. King) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. King, 308 F. Supp. 1143, 1969 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8933 (W.D. Mo. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING CLERK TO DEPOSIT MONEY PAID INTO COURT IN AN INTEREST-BEARING ACCOUNT

BECKER, Chief Judge.

This is an interpleader action which was brought by the plaintiff under § 1335, Title 28, U.S.C. Plaintiff insurer has paid $10,000, the principal amount of the policy, into court. By the summary judgment entered in its favor on June 23, 1969 the plaintiff has been discharged, from all liability except the duty of facilitating and participating in discovery.

The defendants, who are all the remaining claimants for the sum deposited in court, have now jointly moved the court for an order authorizing and directing the Clerk to deposit the sum in an interest-bearing account.

The motion is meritorious and should be granted. Rule 67, F.R.Civ.P., provides that monies deposited into court shall be “deposited and withdrawn in accordance with the provisions of Title 28, U.S.C., §§ 2041, and 2042 * * * ” Section 2041, in turn, provides that such monies “shall be forthwith deposited with the Treasurer of the United States or a designated depositary, in the name and to the credit of such court." (Emphasis added.) This section makes the United States a “trustee for the rightful owners”, In re Moneys Deposited (C.A. 3) 243 F.2d 443, 445, and it has been held to be within the scope of such trusteeship to allow such funds to be converted into interest-bearing forms. Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco v. Long Beach Federal Savings & Loan Ass’n (S.D.Cal.) 122 F.Supp. 401. Further, the deposit of such monies in an account in which they may earn interest at the highest current rate is in accord with current local practice, especially in a case like .the one at bar, where all the interested parties have agreed to the deposit by joining in the motion therefor. Cf. 3 Barron & Holtzoff, Federal Practice and Procedure § 1461, p. 518. It is therefore

Ordered that the sum of $10,000 deposited with the Clerk by the plaintiff herein be deposited by the Clerk in an [1144]*1144account bearing the highest rate of interest obtainable, subject to the withdrawal provisions of § 2042, Title 28, U.S.C., and § 725v, Title 31, U.S.C.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING CLERK TO DEPOSIT MONEY PAID INTO COURT IN AN INTEREST-BEARING ACCOUNT

BECKER, Chief Judge.

This is an interpleader action which was brought by the plaintiff under § 1335, Title 28, U.S.C. Plaintiff insurer has paid $10,000, the principal amount of the policy, into court. By the summary judgment entered in its favor on June 23, 1969 the plaintiff has been discharged, from all liability except the duty of facilitating and participating in discovery.

The defendants, who are all the remaining claimants for the sum deposited in court, have now jointly moved the court for an order authorizing and directing the Clerk to deposit the sum in an interest-bearing account.

The motion is meritorious and should be granted. Rule 67, F.R.Civ.P., provides that monies deposited into court shall be “deposited and withdrawn in accordance with the provisions of Title 28, U.S.C., §§ 2041, and 2042 * * * ” Section 2041, in turn, provides that such monies “shall be forthwith deposited with the Treasurer of the United States or a designated depositary, in the name and to the credit of such court." (Emphasis added.) This section makes the United States a “trustee for the rightful owners”, In re Moneys Deposited (C.A. 3) 243 F.2d 443, 445, and it has been held to be within the scope of such trusteeship to allow such funds to be converted into interest-bearing forms. Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco v. Long Beach Federal Savings & Loan Ass’n (S.D.Cal.) 122 F.Supp. 401. Further, the deposit of such monies in an account in which they may earn interest at the highest current rate is in accord with current local practice, especially in a case like .the one at bar, where all the interested parties have agreed to the deposit by joining in the motion therefor. Cf. 3 Barron & Holtzoff, Federal Practice and Procedure § 1461, p. 518. It is therefore

Ordered that the sum of $10,000 deposited with the Clerk by the plaintiff herein be deposited by the Clerk in an [1144]*1144account bearing the highest rate of interest obtainable, subject to the withdrawal provisions of § 2042, Title 28, U.S.C., and § 725v, Title 31, U.S.C.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

308 F. Supp. 1143, 1969 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8933, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prudential-insurance-co-of-america-v-king-mowd-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack