Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Hunt

206 N.C. 724
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJune 20, 1934
StatusPublished

This text of 206 N.C. 724 (Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Hunt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Hunt, 206 N.C. 724 (N.C. 1934).

Opinion

Bbogden, J.

The judgment rendered is fully supported by Brown v. Brown, 168 N. C., 4, 84 S. E., 25; Yates v. Ins. Co., 173 N. C., 473, 92 S. E., 356, and Boyd v. Campbell, 192 N. C., 398, 135 S. E., 121. In the Boyd case, supra, the Court said: “Whatever the former doctrine may have been the courts do not now regard with favor the application of such technical rules as will defeat the obvious intention of the parties to a deed, it being an elementary rule of construction that their intention as expressed in the deed shall prevail unless it is repugnant to the terms of the grant or is in conflict with some canon of construction or some settled rule of law.”

Affirmed.

Schencic, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brown v. . Brown
84 S.E. 25 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1915)
Yates v. . Insurance Co.
92 S.E. 256 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1917)
Boyd v. . Campbell
135 S.E. 121 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
206 N.C. 724, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prudential-insurance-co-of-america-v-hunt-nc-1934.