Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Hunt

206 N.C. 724
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided June 20, 1934·Published

Opinion

Bbogden, J.

The judgment rendered is fully supported by Brown v. Brown, 168 N. C., 4, 84 S. E., 25; Yates v. Ins. Co., 173 N. C., 473, 92 S. E., 356, and Boyd v. Campbell, 192 N. C., 398, 135 S. E., 121. In the Boyd case, supra, the Court said: “Whatever the former doctrine may have been the courts do not now regard with favor the application of such technical rules as will defeat the obvious intention of the parties to a deed, it being an elementary rule of construction that their intention as expressed in the deed shall prevail unless it is repugnant to the terms of the grant or is in conflict with some canon of construction or some settled rule of law.”

Affirmed.

Schencic, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Hunt, 206 N.C. 724 (N.C. 1934).

206 N.C. 724 (Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Hunt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brown v. . Brown
84 S.E. 25 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1915)
Yates v. . Insurance Co.
92 S.E. 256 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1917)
Boyd v. . Campbell
135 S.E. 121 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1926)