Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. Reynolds

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. Reynolds

177 S.E. 889, 174 S.C. 547, 1935 S.C. LEXIS 3

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedJanuary 10, 1935

Docket13972

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 177 S.E. 889 (Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. Reynolds) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. Reynolds, 177 S.E. 889, 174 S.C. 547, 1935 S.C. LEXIS 3 (S.C. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. C. J. Ramage, Acting Associate Justice.

It appears to the Court, and we so hold, that Judge Stoll was in error in not granting the motion made for a new trial on after-discovered evidence. As the case will have to be tried again, we prefer not to discuss the details of the testimony so as not to hamper the parties in the subsequent conduct of the case.

If is the judgment of this Court that the order of Judge Stoll be reversed, and the case be, and the same is hereby, remanded for a new trial on the ground of after-discovered evidence.

Reversed.

Messrs. Justices Stabler, Carter and Bonham and Mr. Acting Associate Justice J. Henry Johnson concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI