Prudential Bache Securities v. Archard
This text of 179 A.D.2d 652 (Prudential Bache Securities v. Archard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[653]*653In or before July 1982, the respondents executed subscription agreements with respect to the purchase of limited partnership interests in Outer Space Place, a partnership formed for the purpose of acquiring certain property in Long Island, allegedly sold to them by Prudential Bache Securities, through the agency of the individual appellants. Thereafter, on December 30, 1988, more than six years after the execution of the subscription agreements, the respondents commenced arbitration proceedings with the National Association of Security Dealers (hereinafter NASD) alleging in their supporting papers claims for damages arising out of the alleged fraudulent conduct of the appellants.
The claims asserted by the respondents arose more than six years prior to the commencement of the arbitration proceeding and are therefore time barred, and may not be submitted to arbitration with the NASD (NASD Code of Arbitration Procedure § 15; see also, PaineWebber, Inc. v Farnem, 870 F2d 1286; Matter of County of Rockland [Trimiano Constr. Co.], 51 NY2d 1). Kunzeman, J. P., Sullivan, Fiber and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
179 A.D.2d 652, 579 N.Y.S.2d 890, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 249, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prudential-bache-securities-v-archard-nyappdiv-1992.