Prudential Bache Securities v. Archard

179 A.D.2d 652, 579 N.Y.S.2d 890, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 249
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 13, 1992
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 179 A.D.2d 652 (Prudential Bache Securities v. Archard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Prudential Bache Securities v. Archard, 179 A.D.2d 652, 579 N.Y.S.2d 890, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 249 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

[653]*653In or before July 1982, the respondents executed subscription agreements with respect to the purchase of limited partnership interests in Outer Space Place, a partnership formed for the purpose of acquiring certain property in Long Island, allegedly sold to them by Prudential Bache Securities, through the agency of the individual appellants. Thereafter, on December 30, 1988, more than six years after the execution of the subscription agreements, the respondents commenced arbitration proceedings with the National Association of Security Dealers (hereinafter NASD) alleging in their supporting papers claims for damages arising out of the alleged fraudulent conduct of the appellants.

The claims asserted by the respondents arose more than six years prior to the commencement of the arbitration proceeding and are therefore time barred, and may not be submitted to arbitration with the NASD (NASD Code of Arbitration Procedure § 15; see also, PaineWebber, Inc. v Farnem, 870 F2d 1286; Matter of County of Rockland [Trimiano Constr. Co.], 51 NY2d 1). Kunzeman, J. P., Sullivan, Fiber and O’Brien, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith Barney Shearson Inc. v. Sacharow
689 N.E.2d 884 (New York Court of Appeals, 1997)
Kidder, Peabody & Co. v. Fisch
241 A.D.2d 522 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
PaineWebber, Inc. v. Landay
903 F. Supp. 193 (D. Massachusetts, 1995)
Merrill Lynch Company, Inc. v. Mathes, No. 0126054 (Sep. 1, 1995)
1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 10850 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1995)
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Barnum
162 Misc. 2d 245 (New York Supreme Court, 1994)
Levin v. Advest Inc., No. Cv93-0529887s (Jul. 18, 1994)
1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 7574 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1994)
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Sumi Ohnuma
161 Misc. 2d 423 (New York Supreme Court, 1994)
In re the Arbitration between Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. & Manhard
201 A.D.2d 347 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. v. Jana
835 F. Supp. 406 (N.D. Illinois, 1993)
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. DeChaine
194 A.D.2d 472 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
179 A.D.2d 652, 579 N.Y.S.2d 890, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 249, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prudential-bache-securities-v-archard-nyappdiv-1992.