Prudence Mutual Casualty Co. v. Washington

211 So. 2d 556, 1968 Fla. LEXIS 2220
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided May 29, 1968·No. No. 36729·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The Petition for Writ of Certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the Writ and have heard argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the Petition is without merit. Therefore, the Writ must be and is hereby discharged and the Petition for Writ of Certiorari is denied.

It is so ordered.

CALDWELL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, THORNAL, ERVIN and ADAMS, JJ., concur. DREW, J., concurs specially with Opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Prudence Mutual Casualty Co. v. Washington, 211 So. 2d 556, 1968 Fla. LEXIS 2220 (Fla. 1968).

211 So. 2d 556 (Prudence Mutual Casualty Co. v. Washington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stockman v. Downs
573 So. 2d 835 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1991)
AUTORICO, INC v. Government Employees Ins. Co.
398 So. 2d 485 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
OCALA MUSIC & MARINE CTR. v. Caldwell
389 So. 2d 222 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)