Pruden v. Northrup

1 Root 93
CourtConnecticut Superior Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1784
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Root 93 (Pruden v. Northrup) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pruden v. Northrup, 1 Root 93 (Colo. Ct. App. 1784).

Opinion

By the Superior Court.

There is nothing erroneous in the judgment complained of; the concealment of Helms’ interest, [94]*94and producing him as a witness, whereby the acquittal was procured, was a fraud and imposition, not only upon the libellant, but upon the law and upon the court, for which cause a new trial ought to be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Root 93, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pruden-v-northrup-connsuperct-1784.