Pruden v. Northrup

1 Root 93
Connecticut Superior Court·Decided July 1, 1784·Published

Opinion

By the Superior Court.

There is nothing erroneous in the judgment complained of; the concealment of Helms’ interest, [94] and producing him as a witness, whereby the acquittal was procured, was a fraud and imposition, not only upon the libellant, but upon the law and upon the court, for which cause a new trial ought to be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pruden v. Northrup, 1 Root 93 (Colo. Ct. App. 1784).

1 Root 93 (Pruden v. Northrup) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.