P.R.T. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

P.R.T. v. State

920 So. 2d 708, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 2564, 2006 WL 436045

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 8, 2006

DocketNo. 4D04-1316

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 920 So. 2d 708 (P.R.T. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

P.R.T. v. State, 920 So. 2d 708, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 2564, 2006 WL 436045 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

GROSS, J.

On appeal, P.R.T., challenges the volun-tariness of his plea. P.R.T. pleaded guilty [709]*709to a misdemeanor charge of possession of marijuana, accepting as the consequence of his plea a probation sentence. Thereafter, the trial court entered an adjudication of delinquency and order of disposition sentencing P.R.T. to a level six commitment. The sentence was in opposition to both the recommendation of the Department of Juvenile Justice and the state, as well as in excess of the sentence negotiated in the plea agreement.

P.R.T. filed a motion to withdraw his plea, but later abandoned it. A defendant who pleaded guilty may directly appeal a violation of a plea agreement only if “preserved by a motion to withdraw plea.” Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)b. By abandoning the motion to withdraw plea in the trial court, P.R.T. has failed to preserve his claim for review. See State v. T.G., 800 So.2d 204, 210 (Fla.2001) (“[Jjuveniles pleading guilty ... may directly appeal an involuntary plea only if it is preserved by a motion to withdraw plea in the trial court.”).

This appeal is dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction.

STONE and MAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GROSS, J.

On appeal, P.R.T., challenges the volun-tariness of his plea. P.R.T. pleaded guilty [709]*709to a misdemeanor charge of possession of marijuana, accepting as the consequence of his plea a probation sentence. Thereafter, the trial court entered an adjudication of delinquency and order of disposition sentencing P.R.T. to a level six commitment. The sentence was in opposition to both the recommendation of the Department of Juvenile Justice and the state, as well as in excess of the sentence negotiated in the plea agreement.

P.R.T. filed a motion to withdraw his plea, but later abandoned it. A defendant who pleaded guilty may directly appeal a violation of a plea agreement only if “preserved by a motion to withdraw plea.” Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)b. By abandoning the motion to withdraw plea in the trial court, P.R.T. has failed to preserve his claim for review. See State v. T.G., 800 So.2d 204, 210 (Fla.2001) (“[Jjuveniles pleading guilty ... may directly appeal an involuntary plea only if it is preserved by a motion to withdraw plea in the trial court.”).

This appeal is dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction.

STONE and MAY, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

920 So. 2d 708, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 2564, 2006 WL 436045, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prt-v-state-fladistctapp-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack