Provstgaard v. Nye County
This text of Provstgaard v. Nye County (Provstgaard v. Nye County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7| SHERIL PROVSTGAARD, Case No. 2:25-cv-00649-CDS-NJK 8 Plaintiff(s), Order 9] v. [Docket No. 8] 10] NYE COUNTY, et al., 11 Defendant(s). 12 Pending before the Court is a motion for non-party Rachel Provstgaard to file 13] electronically. Docket No. 8. 14 Pro se litigants may request authorization to register as electronic filers in a specific case. 15] Local Rule IC 2-1(b). Electronic filing by pro se parties is a privilege granted by the Court that is subject to the Court’s inherent authority in managing its docket. See Silver v. Wolfson, 2019 US. Dist. Lexis 71275, at *3 (D. Nev. Apr. 26, 2019) (revoking permission for electronic filing). 18 Rachel Provstgaard is not a party to this case and she not authorized to proceed pro se on 19] the behalf of Plaintiff. CE. Pope Equity Tr. v. United States, 818 F.2d 696, 697 (9th Cir. 1987). 20|| The Court declines to give permission for Rachel Provstgaard to file electronically in this case. 21 Accordingly, the motion to file electronically is DENIED. 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 Dated: April 28, 2025 24 AN ——, Nancy J. Ko 25 United States Magistrate Judge 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Provstgaard v. Nye County, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/provstgaard-v-nye-county-nvd-2025.