Provost v. Provost

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Provost v. Provost

82 A.D.2d 995, 440 N.Y.S.2d 89, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14724

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 18, 1981

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 82 A.D.2d 995 (Provost v. Provost) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Provost v. Provost, 82 A.D.2d 995, 440 N.Y.S.2d 89, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14724 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion for permission to proceed as a poor person with assigned counsel on appeal taken as of right from an order of the Family Court, Ulster County, which awarded petitioner temporary custody of children and temporary exclusive possession of marital residence. Section 1112 of the Family Court Act provides that an appeal may be taken as of right from an order of disposition, and, in the discretion of the appropriate Appellate Division, from any other order under the Family Court Act. An “order of disposition” is a [996]*996“final” order (Matter of Taylor v Taylor, 23 AD2d 747). The order purportedly appealed from is not a final order (cf. Firestone v Firestone, 44 AD2d 671; Matter ofofCiotti vButera, 24 AD2d 983) and is thus not appealable as of right. Motion denied, without costs and without prejudice to renewal after petitioner shall have obtained permission to appeal. Mahoney, P.J., Sweeney, Casey, Yesawich, Jr., and Weiss, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for permission to proceed as a poor person with assigned counsel on appeal taken as of right from an order of the Family Court, Ulster County, which awarded petitioner temporary custody of children and temporary exclusive possession of marital residence. Section 1112 of the Family Court Act provides that an appeal may be taken as of right from an order of disposition, and, in the discretion of the appropriate Appellate Division, from any other order under the Family Court Act. An “order of disposition” is a [996]*996“final” order (Matter of Taylor v Taylor, 23 AD2d 747). The order purportedly appealed from is not a final order (cf. Firestone v Firestone, 44 AD2d 671; Matter ofofCiotti vButera, 24 AD2d 983) and is thus not appealable as of right. Motion denied, without costs and without prejudice to renewal after petitioner shall have obtained permission to appeal. Mahoney, P.J., Sweeney, Casey, Yesawich, Jr., and Weiss, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

82 A.D.2d 995, 440 N.Y.S.2d 89, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14724, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/provost-v-provost-nyappdiv-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack