Provost v. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
737 N.W.2d 706, 480 Mich. 858
This text of 737 N.W.2d 706 (Provost v. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Provost v. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 737 N.W.2d 706, 480 Mich. 858 (Mich. 2007).
Opinion
Stephanie D. PROVOST, Plaintiff, and
Bonnie Christian, Plaintiff-Appellant, and
Denise M. Roberson, Plaintiff, Counter-Defendant,
v.
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant-Appellee, and
Ronald Baptist, Defendant, Counter-Plaintiff.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 20, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
People v. Hubbard
737 N.W.2d 706 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2007)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
737 N.W.2d 706, 480 Mich. 858, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/provost-v-michigan-department-of-corrections-mich-2007.