Providian National Bank v. McGowan
This text of 186 Misc. 2d 553 (Providian National Bank v. McGowan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[554]*554OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Order, insofar as appealed from, unanimously modified by reducing the sanctions imposed against Andrew Capoccia Law Centers L. L. C. and Michael Scaptura to the sums of $3,500 and $1,500, respectively, and, as modified, affirmed without costs.
In our opinion, defendant’s affirmative defenses, counterclaims and opposition to the motion for summary judgment were “completely without merit in law” within the meaning of 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 (c) (1). Although we agree with the lower court’s findings, we are of the opinion that the sanctions imposed were excessive and should be reduced.
Aronin, P. J., Chetta and Patterson, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
186 Misc. 2d 553, 720 N.Y.S.2d 709, 2000 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 549, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/providian-national-bank-v-mcgowan-nyappterm-2000.