Provident Savings Life Assurance Society v. City of Omaha
This text of 100 N.W. 1127 (Provident Savings Life Assurance Society v. City of Omaha) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case differs from that of Aachen & Munich Fire Ins. Co. v. City of Omaha, ante, p. 112, only in the circumstance that the plaintiff is a life insurance company instead of a fire insurance company. It is unnecessary to repeat our reasons for recommending that the action be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiff.
For the reasons stated in the foregoing opinion, it is ordered that the action be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiff.
Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
100 N.W. 1127, 72 Neb. 113, 1904 Neb. LEXIS 219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/provident-savings-life-assurance-society-v-city-of-omaha-neb-1904.