Provident Life & Casualty Insurance v. Hersko

246 A.D.2d 365, 666 N.Y.S.2d 419, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 233
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 13, 1998·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Beatrice Shainswit, J.), entered on or about July 3,1997, which granted defendant’s motion to vacate a default judgment, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The motion court properly exercised its discretion in finding that defendant showed a reasonable excuse for the default (see, Hunter v Enquirer/Star, Inc., 210 AD2d 32), and that his affidavit of merit was sufficient (see, Mufalli v Ford Motor Co., 105 AD2d 642, 643). The record indicates issues as to whether defendant did, in fact, fail to provide accurate, material information that he was under a duty to provide and whether such nondisclosure, if any, affected plaintiff’s decision to issue the insurance policy in question (see, Smirlock Realty Corp. v Title Guar. Co., 52 NY2d 179, 187). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Ellerin, Nardelli and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Provident Life & Casualty Insurance v. Hersko, 246 A.D.2d 365, 666 N.Y.S.2d 419, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 233 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

246 A.D.2d 365 (Provident Life & Casualty Insurance v. Hersko) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

HSBC Bank USA v. Lugo
127 A.D.3d 502 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Navarro v. A. Trenkman Estate, Inc.
279 A.D.2d 257 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Mediavilla v. Gurman
272 A.D.2d 146 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Princeton Venture Research, Inc. v. Kaye, Scholer, Fierman, Hays & Handler, L. L. P.
256 A.D.2d 222 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)