Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/Provident Institution for Saving v. Mead

Provident Institution for Saving v. Mead

102 A. 1053, 88 N.J. Eq. 349, 3 Stock. 349, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 496
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 11, 1917·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Stevenson.

[350]*350For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Kalisch, Black, White, Heprenheimer, Williams, Taylor — 11. For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Provident Institution for Saving v. Mead, 102 A. 1053, 88 N.J. Eq. 349, 3 Stock. 349, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 496 (N.J. 1917).

102 A. 1053 (Provident Institution for Saving v. Mead) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Taylor
100 A.2d 346 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1953)
Straut v. Hollinger
50 A.2d 478 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1947)
Heise v. Earle
35 A.2d 880 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1944)
Burnham v. Town of Templeton
182 N.E. 822 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1932)
Aller v. Crouter
54 A. 426 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1903)
Lovett v. Taylor
54 N.J. Eq. 311 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1896)
Tynan v. Warren
53 N.J. Eq. 313 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1895)
Silvers v. Potter
48 N.J. Eq. 539 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1891)
Voorhis v. Westervelt
43 N.J. Eq. 642 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1887)
Slocum v. Wooley
43 N.J. Eq. 451 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1887)
McVay v. McVay
43 N.J. Eq. 47 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1887)