Proverb v. Niesley

32 A.D.2d 657, 300 N.Y.S.2d 780, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3941
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 19, 1969·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the CPLR to direct respondents to entertain petitioner’s appeal from a determination of the Nassau County Acting Police Commissioner, disciplining petitioner for violation of departmental regulations, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated July 15, 1965, which dismissed the petition. Judgment reversed, on the law, with $10 costs and disbursements, and respondents are directed to hear and determine petitioner’s appeal from the determination of the Acting Commissioner on the merits. Petitioner had the right to elect to appeal to respondents (Civil Service Law, §§ 76, 2). The reference in subdivision d of section 8-13.0 of the Nassau County Administrative Code (L. 1939, chs. 272, 701-709, as amd. by L. 1948, ch. 436) to “A petition to review a determination ” does not constitute a limitation to a proceeding under article 78 of the CPLR. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Hopkins and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proverb v. Niesley, 32 A.D.2d 657, 300 N.Y.S.2d 780, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3941 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

32 A.D.2d 657 (Proverb v. Niesley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. Hoyt
59 A.D.2d 1058 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
Bianca v. Frank
55 A.D.2d 642 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)