Proverb v. Niesley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Proverb v. Niesley

32 A.D.2d 657, 300 N.Y.S.2d 780, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3941

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 19, 1969

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 32 A.D.2d 657 (Proverb v. Niesley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Proverb v. Niesley, 32 A.D.2d 657, 300 N.Y.S.2d 780, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3941 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the CPLR to direct respondents to entertain petitioner’s appeal from a determination of the Nassau County Acting Police Commissioner, disciplining petitioner for violation of departmental regulations, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated July 15, 1965, which dismissed the petition. Judgment reversed, on the law, with $10 costs and disbursements, and respondents are directed to hear and determine petitioner’s appeal from the determination of the Acting Commissioner on the merits. Petitioner had the right to elect to appeal to respondents (Civil Service Law, §§ 76, 2). The reference in subdivision d of section 8-13.0 of the Nassau County Administrative Code (L. 1939, chs. 272, 701-709, as amd. by L. 1948, ch. 436) to “A petition to review a determination ” does not constitute a limitation to a proceeding under article 78 of the CPLR. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Hopkins and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the CPLR to direct respondents to entertain petitioner’s appeal from a determination of the Nassau County Acting Police Commissioner, disciplining petitioner for violation of departmental regulations, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated July 15, 1965, which dismissed the petition. Judgment reversed, on the law, with $10 costs and disbursements, and respondents are directed to hear and determine petitioner’s appeal from the determination of the Acting Commissioner on the merits. Petitioner had the right to elect to appeal to respondents (Civil Service Law, §§ 76, 2). The reference in subdivision d of section 8-13.0 of the Nassau County Administrative Code (L. 1939, chs. 272, 701-709, as amd. by L. 1948, ch. 436) to “A petition to review a determination ” does not constitute a limitation to a proceeding under article 78 of the CPLR. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Hopkins and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

32 A.D.2d 657, 300 N.Y.S.2d 780, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3941, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/proverb-v-niesley-nyappdiv-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack