Provenzano v. Provenzano
This text of 986 So. 2d 663 (Provenzano v. Provenzano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Ross PROVENZANO, Jr., Appellant,
v.
Daniel PROVENZANO, Joanne Olszewski Provenzano, and Donald R. Walters, Appellees.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Thomas M. Karr and David R. Carlisle of Duane Morris LLP, Miami, for appellant.
Jonathan Feuerman of Therrel Baisden, P.A., and Terrence S. Schwartz of Law Offices of Terrence S. Schwartz, Miami, for Appellees-Daniel Provenzano and Joanne Olszewski Provenzano.
PER CURIAM.
The parties do not dispute that it was error to appoint Donald Walters, a stranger to the estate, as personal representative, without affording Appellant and Appellees notice and an opportunity to be heard on their competing motions for appointment.
We reverse the order and remand for further proceedings on the motions for appointment of personal representative.
STONE, HAZOURI, JJ. and GERBER, JONATHAN, Associate Judge, concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
986 So. 2d 663, 2008 WL 2986516, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/provenzano-v-provenzano-fladistctapp-2008.