Proven Pictures, Inc. v. Strand Theatre Operating Co.

3 A.2d 650, 136 Me. 512, 1939 Me. LEXIS 47
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedJanuary 18, 1939
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 3 A.2d 650 (Proven Pictures, Inc. v. Strand Theatre Operating Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Proven Pictures, Inc. v. Strand Theatre Operating Co., 3 A.2d 650, 136 Me. 512, 1939 Me. LEXIS 47 (Me. 1939).

Opinion

In the instant case, the bill of exceptions, although allowed below, presents, in and of itself, no question of law for appellate review.

This Court can not, in acting on the exceptions, consider the report of the evidence, nor the rulings of law, nor the conclusions of law of the justice before whom, jury waived, the trial (subject to reserving exceptions) was, except the evidence and the rulings and conclusions are made a part of the bill of exceptions. They are not so made. There is in the bill no affirmative showing of reversible error. The excepting defendants take nothing by their fatally defective exceptions. Jones v. Jones, 101 Me., 447, 450, 64 A., 815; Doylestown Agricultural Co. v. Brackett, Shaw & Lunt Co., 109 Me., 301, 84 A., 146; Hurley v. Farnsworth, 115 Me., 321, 98 A., 821; Feltis v. Power Co., 120 Me., 101, 112 A., 906; State v. Belanger, 127 Me., 327, 143 A., 170. Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Barrett v. S. S. Kresge Co.
19 A.2d 502 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1941)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 A.2d 650, 136 Me. 512, 1939 Me. LEXIS 47, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/proven-pictures-inc-v-strand-theatre-operating-co-me-1939.