Provecasa v. Gemini Associated Corp.

532 So. 2d 1106, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2317, 8 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 404, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4491, 1988 WL 103883
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 11, 1988·No. No. 88-299·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment entered for the defendant Francisco Gaitan in this suit brought by the plaintiff, Provecasa, to collect on a dishonored check is reversed with directions to enter judgment for Provecasa. Where, as here, the instrument, bearing the name Gemini Associated Corporation as the entity represented by Gaitan, was signed by Gaitan with no indication thereon that he signed in a representative capacity, and it was not shown or, indeed, even contended that Provecasa and Gaitan established that Gaitan would nevertheless be exempt from personal liability, Gaitan, as well as his principal, is liable to Provecasa. Medley Harwoods, Inc. v. Novy, 346 So.2d 1224 (Fla.3d DCA 1977). See MJZ Corp. v. Gulfstream First Bank & Trust, N.A., 420 So.2d 396 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); § 673.403, Fla.Stat. (1985).

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Provecasa v. Gemini Associated Corp., 532 So. 2d 1106, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2317, 8 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 404, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4491, 1988 WL 103883 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

532 So. 2d 1106 (Provecasa v. Gemini Associated Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

BBD Electrical Distributors, Inc. v. Magid
673 So. 2d 80 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Solomon v. Betras Plastics, Inc.
550 So. 2d 1182 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Newport Seafood, Inc. v. Neptune Trading Corp.
555 So. 2d 376 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)