Provau v. Bostick

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Provau v. Bostick

177 So. 2d 374, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 3940

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 27, 1965

DocketNo. G-129

StatusPublished

This text of 177 So. 2d 374 (Provau v. Bostick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Provau v. Bostick, 177 So. 2d 374, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 3940 (Fla. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. See Crowell v. Fink (Fla.App. 1964), 167 So.2d 614; Webster v. Kemp (Fla.1964), 164 So.2d 814; Carraway v. Revell (Fla.1959), 116 So.2d 16.

WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., CARROLL, DONALD, J., and FITZPATRICK, W. L., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. See Crowell v. Fink (Fla.App. 1964), 167 So.2d 614; Webster v. Kemp (Fla.1964), 164 So.2d 814; Carraway v. Revell (Fla.1959), 116 So.2d 16.

WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., CARROLL, DONALD, J., and FITZPATRICK, W. L., Associate Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

177 So. 2d 374, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 3940, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/provau-v-bostick-fladistctapp-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack