Provau v. Bostick

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Provau v. Bostick

177 So. 2d 374, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 3940

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 27, 1965·No. No. G-129·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. See Crowell v. Fink (Fla.App. 1964), 167 So.2d 614; Webster v. Kemp (Fla.1964), 164 So.2d 814; Carraway v. Revell (Fla.1959), 116 So.2d 16.

WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., CARROLL, DONALD, J., and FITZPATRICK, W. L., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. See Crowell v. Fink (Fla.App. 1964), 167 So.2d 614; Webster v. Kemp (Fla.1964), 164 So.2d 814; Carraway v. Revell (Fla.1959), 116 So.2d 16.

WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., CARROLL, DONALD, J., and FITZPATRICK, W. L., Associate Judge, concur.

Provau v. Bostick, 177 So. 2d 374, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 3940 (Fla. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

177 So. 2d 374 (Provau v. Bostick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related