Prouty v. Wilson

123 Mass. 297, 1877 Mass. LEXIS 269
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedOctober 3, 1877
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 123 Mass. 297 (Prouty v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Prouty v. Wilson, 123 Mass. 297, 1877 Mass. LEXIS 269 (Mass. 1877).

Opinion

By the Court.

The legal title in the note was in the administrator of the payee. The evidence warranted the jury in finding that both the defendants assented to and ratified the note in its altered form and thereby agreed to pay the same to the lawful holder, for the sufficient consideration of an agreement to forbear and an actual forbearance by those who apparently had the actual control of the note and the equitable interest therein. Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Barrett v. Effenberg
119 P. 135 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1911)
Holyfield v. Harrington
115 P. 546 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1911)
Bedford's Exr. v. Chandler
69 A. 874 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1908)
Stringfellow v. Petty
89 P. 258 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1907)
Ballard v. Burton
64 Vt. 387 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1892)
Montgomery v. Crossthwait
90 Ala. 553 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1890)
Howe v. Taggart
133 Mass. 284 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1882)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
123 Mass. 297, 1877 Mass. LEXIS 269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prouty-v-wilson-mass-1877.