Prouty v. Wilson
123 Mass. 297, 1877 Mass. LEXIS 269
Opinion
The legal title in the note was in the administrator of the payee. The evidence warranted the jury in finding that both the defendants assented to and ratified the note in its altered form and thereby agreed to pay the same to the lawful holder, for the sufficient consideration of an agreement to forbear and an actual forbearance by those who apparently had the actual control of the note and the equitable interest therein. Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Prouty v. Wilson, 123 Mass. 297, 1877 Mass. LEXIS 269 (Mass. 1877).
123 Mass. 297 (Prouty v. Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Barrett v. Effenberg
119 P. 135 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1911)
Holyfield v. Harrington
115 P. 546 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1911)
Bedford's Exr. v. Chandler
69 A. 874 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1908)
Stringfellow v. Petty
89 P. 258 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1907)
Ballard v. Burton
64 Vt. 387 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1892)
Montgomery v. Crossthwait
90 Ala. 553 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1890)
Howe v. Taggart
133 Mass. 284 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1882)