Prouty v. Roberts

60 Mass. 19, 6 Allen 19
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided September 15, 1850·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

The directions we think were right; the plaintiff proved a legal title to the note, and the facts proposed to be proved by the defendant could afford him no ground of defence. It was no fraud upon the defendant; he was called upon to pay only what he had undertaken to pay ; and payment to the plaintiff would be a good discharge. Knights v. Putnam, 3 Pick. 184. Judgment on the verdict.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Prouty v. Roberts, 60 Mass. 19, 6 Allen 19 (Mass. 1850).

60 Mass. 19 (Prouty v. Roberts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bowles v. Oakman
225 N.W. 613 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1929)