Prouty v. Prouty & Barr Boot & Shoe Co.
This text of 25 A. 1001 (Prouty v. Prouty & Barr Boot & Shoe Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The specifications of error are numerous, and refer to the findings of fact by the auditor. No portion of the testimony is printed beyond that of a documentary character. We do not agree that the documents referred to show any errors in the findings of the master, or in the conclusions he draws from admitted facts, approved as they are by the learned court below. A discussion of the numerous assignments would consume much time to little purpose.
The decree is affirmed, and the appeal dismissed at the costs of the appellants.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
25 A. 1001, 155 Pa. 112, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1199, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prouty-v-prouty-barr-boot-shoe-co-pa-1893.