Prouty v. . Lake Shore Michigan Southern Railway Company
95 N.Y. 667, 1884 N.Y. LEXIS 729
Opinion
reads mem. for reversal of orders of Special and General Terms and for granting of motion on authority of O'Brien v. Young.
All concur, except Rapallo and Andrews, JJ., not sitting.
Ordered accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Prouty v. . Lake Shore Michigan Southern Railway Company, 95 N.Y. 667, 1884 N.Y. LEXIS 729 (N.Y. 1884).
95 N.Y. 667 (Prouty v. . Lake Shore Michigan Southern Railway Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wells, Fargo & Co. v. Davis
1 Silv. Ct. App. 457 (New York Court of Appeals, 1887)