Prouty v. . Lake Shore Michigan Southern Railway Company
95 N.Y. 667, 1884 N.Y. LEXIS 729
This text of 95 N.Y. 667 (Prouty v. . Lake Shore Michigan Southern Railway Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Prouty v. . Lake Shore Michigan Southern Railway Company, 95 N.Y. 667, 1884 N.Y. LEXIS 729 (N.Y. 1884).
Opinion
reads mem. for reversal of orders of Special and General Terms and for granting of motion on authority of O'Brien v. Young.
All concur, except Rapallo and Andrews, JJ., not sitting.
Ordered accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Wells, Fargo & Co. v. Davis
1 Silv. Ct. App. 457 (New York Court of Appeals, 1887)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
95 N.Y. 667, 1884 N.Y. LEXIS 729, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prouty-v-lake-shore-michigan-southern-railway-company-ny-1884.