Prouty v. Glens Falls, Sandy Hill & Ft. Edward Street Railway Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Prouty v. Glens Falls, Sandy Hill & Ft. Edward Street Railway Co.

62 N.Y.S. 152, 47 A.D. 627

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 16, 1900

StatusPublished

This text of 62 N.Y.S. 152 (Prouty v. Glens Falls, Sandy Hill & Ft. Edward Street Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Prouty v. Glens Falls, Sandy Hill & Ft. Edward Street Railway Co., 62 N.Y.S. 152, 47 A.D. 627 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

HERRICK, J.

There is no- controversy in this case, and no issue made, upon either the question of the negligence of the defendant or the contributory negligence of the plaintiff. The only issue raised is as to whether the plaintiff was in fact injured by the collision referred to- in the complaint. The collision in which the plaintiff claims to have been injured took place in Washington county, between the villages of Ft. Edward and Sandy Hill. The defendant, in its moving affidavit, swears to the necessity of having eleven witnesses present upon the trial, nine of whom are residents of Washington county, and two of Warren county. It is claimed that these witnesses were all eyewitnesses of the collision, and that their testimony will show that, as a matter of fact, the plaintiff received no injury at the collision in question, which is the point at issue in the case. The plaintiff swears to the necessity of having twelve witnesses, ten of whom are residents in Albany county, and two in Saratoga county. Five of these witnesses are expected to testify as to the plaintiff’s condition after he returned home to Albany county, the time he remained sick, and the extent of such sickness, and four of the five as to his condition prior to the alleged injury. These latter matters are not matters in issue or controverted by the defendant, and we fail to see the necessity of having so many witnesses upon a subject which is [153]*153not a matter oí controversy; and we are oí the opinion that because the cause of action arose in Washington county, and because it appears that the convenience of the greater number of necessary witnesses upon the trial of the action will be thereby subserved, the place of trial should be changed from Albany county to Washington county.

The order appealed from is therefore reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements of this appeal, and the motion granted, with $10 costs to abide the event of the action. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HERRICK, J.

There is no- controversy in this case, and no issue made, upon either the question of the negligence of the defendant or the contributory negligence of the plaintiff. The only issue raised is as to whether the plaintiff was in fact injured by the collision referred to- in the complaint. The collision in which the plaintiff claims to have been injured took place in Washington county, between the villages of Ft. Edward and Sandy Hill. The defendant, in its moving affidavit, swears to the necessity of having eleven witnesses present upon the trial, nine of whom are residents of Washington county, and two of Warren county. It is claimed that these witnesses were all eyewitnesses of the collision, and that their testimony will show that, as a matter of fact, the plaintiff received no injury at the collision in question, which is the point at issue in the case. The plaintiff swears to the necessity of having twelve witnesses, ten of whom are residents in Albany county, and two in Saratoga county. Five of these witnesses are expected to testify as to the plaintiff’s condition after he returned home to Albany county, the time he remained sick, and the extent of such sickness, and four of the five as to his condition prior to the alleged injury. These latter matters are not matters in issue or controverted by the defendant, and we fail to see the necessity of having so many witnesses upon a subject which is [153]*153not a matter oí controversy; and we are oí the opinion that because the cause of action arose in Washington county, and because it appears that the convenience of the greater number of necessary witnesses upon the trial of the action will be thereby subserved, the place of trial should be changed from Albany county to Washington county.

The order appealed from is therefore reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements of this appeal, and the motion granted, with $10 costs to abide the event of the action. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

62 N.Y.S. 152, 47 A.D. 627, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prouty-v-glens-falls-sandy-hill-ft-edward-street-railway-co-nyappdiv-1900.