Prout v. Prout

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Prout v. Prout

81 A. 757, 82 N.J.L. 537, 53 Vroom 537, 1911 N.J. LEXIS 255

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedNovember 20, 1911

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 81 A. 757 (Prout v. Prout) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Prout v. Prout, 81 A. 757, 82 N.J.L. 537, 53 Vroom 537, 1911 N.J. LEXIS 255 (N.J. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon all points except the second we agree with the opinion of the Supreme Court. As to the second we prefer to express no opinion, because the record discloses that no ground of objection was stated at the trial to the introduction of the Bible in evidence, and therefore, on familiar principles, no legal question was raised by the objection.

The judgment under review should be affirmed.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Garrison, Swayze, Parker, Bergen, Yoorhees, Kalisch, Bogert, Vredbn-BITRGH, CONGDON, WHITE, JJ. 11.

For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI