Prough v. Harrisburg Hospital & Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Prough v. Harrisburg Hospital & Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

369 A.2d 893, 28 Pa. Commw. 649, 1977 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 712

CourtCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedFebruary 28, 1977

DocketAppeal, No. 806 C.D. 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 369 A.2d 893 (Prough v. Harrisburg Hospital & Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Prough v. Harrisburg Hospital & Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board, 369 A.2d 893, 28 Pa. Commw. 649, 1977 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 712 (Pa. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Memorandum Order by

Judge Wilkinson,

Now, February 28, 1977, the above appeal having come on for argument and it appearing to the Court and counsels for all parties that remand to the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) is necessary to have it make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to the extent of claimant’s partial disability, by oral agreement of counsel in open Court, the order of the Board dated April 22, 1976, is hereby reversed and the matter is remanded to the Board, if additional testimony is needed or to the referee if based on the present record of the proceedings, for the purpose of making findings of fact and conclusions of law as to the extent of claimant’s partial disability.

A right of appeal is preserved to any party aggrieved by the order of the Board on remand.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Memorandum Order by

Judge Wilkinson,

Now, February 28, 1977, the above appeal having come on for argument and it appearing to the Court and counsels for all parties that remand to the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) is necessary to have it make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to the extent of claimant’s partial disability, by oral agreement of counsel in open Court, the order of the Board dated April 22, 1976, is hereby reversed and the matter is remanded to the Board, if additional testimony is needed or to the referee if based on the present record of the proceedings, for the purpose of making findings of fact and conclusions of law as to the extent of claimant’s partial disability.

A right of appeal is preserved to any party aggrieved by the order of the Board on remand.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

369 A.2d 893, 28 Pa. Commw. 649, 1977 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 712, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prough-v-harrisburg-hospital-workmens-compensation-appeal-board-pacommwct-1977.