Proudfoot v. Seaescape Ltd.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Proudfoot v. Seaescape Ltd.

620 So. 2d 1096, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6939, 1993 WL 230130

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 29, 1993

DocketNo. 93-328

StatusPublished

This text of 620 So. 2d 1096 (Proudfoot v. Seaescape Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Proudfoot v. Seaescape Ltd., 620 So. 2d 1096, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6939, 1993 WL 230130 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The duty to maintain Terminal No. 6 in the Port of Miami does not fall upon Seaes-cape. Metropolitan Dade County owns, cleans, inspects and maintains Terminal No. 6. Moreover, Port of Miami employees inspect, repair, maintain, and clean the terminal. Accordingly, the trial court correctly granted summary judgment in favor of Seaescape. See Air Canada v. Smith, 357 So.2d 789 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978); see generally, Corrales v. Spieler, 588 So.2d 1057 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The duty to maintain Terminal No. 6 in the Port of Miami does not fall upon Seaes-cape. Metropolitan Dade County owns, cleans, inspects and maintains Terminal No. 6. Moreover, Port of Miami employees inspect, repair, maintain, and clean the terminal. Accordingly, the trial court correctly granted summary judgment in favor of Seaescape. See Air Canada v. Smith, 357 So.2d 789 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978); see generally, Corrales v. Spieler, 588 So.2d 1057 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

620 So. 2d 1096, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6939, 1993 WL 230130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/proudfoot-v-seaescape-ltd-fladistctapp-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack