Proud v. Southern Pacific Milling Company
This text of 195 P. 401 (Proud v. Southern Pacific Milling Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Although they are three separate and independent suits, the three above-mentioned cases are identical in their facts with the facts of the case of Runkle v. Southern Pacific MillingCo., ante, p. 714, [195 P. 398]. The points urged for a reversal in these cases by appellant, Southern Pacific Milling Company, are the same as those which were presented in said case of Runkle v. Southern Pacific Milling Co., and, therefore, what we have said in the latter case sufficiently disposes of the points made. Upon the authority of that case the judgments in these three cases are affirmed.
*Page 1
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
195 P. 401, 184 Cal. 809, 1921 Cal. LEXIS 633, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/proud-v-southern-pacific-milling-company-cal-1921.