Proud v. Southern Pacific Milling Co.
This text of 184 Cal. 809 (Proud v. Southern Pacific Milling Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Although they are three separate and independent suits, the three above-mentioned eases are identica in their facts with the facts of the case of Runkle v. Southern Pacific Milling Co., ante, p. 714, [195 Pac. 898]. The points urged for a reversal in these cases by appellant, Southern Pacific Milling Company, are the same as those which were presented in said case of Runkle v. Southern Pacific Milling Co., and, therefore, what we have said in the latter case sufficiently disposes of the points made. Upon the authority of that case the judgments in these three cases are affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
184 Cal. 809, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/proud-v-southern-pacific-milling-co-cal-1921.