Protosenia v. Brothers Valley Coal Co.

96 A. 476, 251 Pa. 175, 1915 Pa. LEXIS 652
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 28, 1915·No. Appeal, No. 230·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

That the plaintiff was entitled to judgment on the verdict is clearly demonstrated in the opinion of the court denying judgment for the defendant n. o. v., and on that opinion the appeal is dismissed and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Protosenia v. Brothers Valley Coal Co., 96 A. 476, 251 Pa. 175, 1915 Pa. LEXIS 652 (Pa. 1915).

96 A. 476 (Protosenia v. Brothers Valley Coal Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fullard v. Pittsburgh Urban Redevelopment Authority
293 A.2d 118 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1972)
Lynott v. Scranton Coal Co.
112 A. 741 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1921)
McGrath v. Atlantic Refining Co.
107 A. 741 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1919)
Kolalsky v. Delaware & Hudson Co.
103 A. 721 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1918)