Prothro v. Word

45 Ga. 330
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 15, 1872
StatusPublished

This text of 45 Ga. 330 (Prothro v. Word) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Prothro v. Word, 45 Ga. 330 (Ga. 1872).

Opinion

To the bill of exceptions in this cause was a certificate that it was the true original, and that “the foregoing pages is a true and complete transcript of the record in the case of A. R. Word and wife et al. vs. E. J. Prothro and Emeline S. Prothro, executor and executrix of Nathaniel Prothro, deceased.”

That seemed to be the case specified in the bill of exceptions. There were no “ foregoing pages.” But tied up with the bill of exceptions were seventeen other papers, being a bill in equity, an amendment thereto, an answer and exceptions thereto, etc., each separate and distinct from the other. It was said that these were the “foregoing pages,” and that it would appear by an inspection of them. The Court would not inspect them. Upon motion of counsel for defendant in error the cause was dismissed, because the record had not been certified according to law. 24th February, 1872.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
45 Ga. 330, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prothro-v-word-ga-1872.