Protests 998849-G of Henry V. Allien & Co.
This text of 13 Cust. Ct. 242 (Protests 998849-G of Henry V. Allien & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
When the cases were called for hearing it was agreed in open court that certain of the merchandise in question is the same in all material respects as that involved in Meyer v. United States (6 Cust. Ct. 191, C. D. 459), which record was incorporated herein. In accordance therewith the claim that the merchandise is woven fabrics wholly or in chief value of any of the materials provided for in paragraph 385, and therefore dutiable at 40 percent under paragraph 385 as modified, was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
13 Cust. Ct. 242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protests-998849-g-of-henry-v-allien-co-cusc-1944.