Protests 996736-G of Suen Mark & Co.

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 996736-G of Suen Mark & Co.

12 Cust. Ct. 299

United States Customs Court·Decided April 21, 1944·No. No. 49372·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Cole,-J.

The merchandise was classified under the same paragraphs and claimed dutiable at the same rates as similar merchandise covered by the decision in Quong Yuen Shing v. United States (31 C. C. P. A. 43, C. A. D. 247). In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of said cited case the merchandise at bar was found to contain salt and was therefore excluded from paragraph 5. The protests were sustained to this extent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Cole,-J.

The merchandise was classified under the same paragraphs and claimed dutiable at the same rates as similar merchandise covered by the decision in Quong Yuen Shing v. United States (31 C. C. P. A. 43, C. A. D. 247). In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of said cited case the merchandise at bar was found to contain salt and was therefore excluded from paragraph 5. The protests were sustained to this extent.

Protests 996736-G of Suen Mark & Co., 12 Cust. Ct. 299 (cusc 1944).

Pincite

12 Cust. Ct. 299 (Protests 996736-G of Suen Mark & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.