Protests 99663-K of Bamberger

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 99663-K of Bamberger

17 Cust. Ct. 222

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedNovember 20, 1946

DocketNo. 51428

StatusPublished

This text of 17 Cust. Ct. 222 (Protests 99663-K of Bamberger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Protests 99663-K of Bamberger, 17 Cust. Ct. 222 (cusc 1946).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of articles similar in all material respects to those the subject of American Import Co. v. United States (15 Cust. Ct. 190, C. D. 970). In accordance therewith it was held that the Mexican pottery articles of common yellow, brown, red, or gray earthenware, except such articles as would come under the classification of vases, mugs, cups, statuettes, or ornaments which are specifically provided for under paragraph 211, are properly dutiable at 20 percent under paragraph 210 as claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of articles similar in all material respects to those the subject of American Import Co. v. United States (15 Cust. Ct. 190, C. D. 970). In accordance therewith it was held that the Mexican pottery articles of common yellow, brown, red, or gray earthenware, except such articles as would come under the classification of vases, mugs, cups, statuettes, or ornaments which are specifically provided for under paragraph 211, are properly dutiable at 20 percent under paragraph 210 as claimed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 Cust. Ct. 222, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protests-99663-k-of-bamberger-cusc-1946.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack