Protests 99626-K of August F. Stauff & Co.

15 Cust. Ct. 255
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedAugust 29, 1945
DocketNo. 50436
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 15 Cust. Ct. 255 (Protests 99626-K of August F. Stauff & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Protests 99626-K of August F. Stauff & Co., 15 Cust. Ct. 255 (cusc 1945).

Opinion

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The uncontradicted testimony of two examiners disclosed .that the articles constitute integral parts of an extrusion press. Inasmuch as the articles were conclusively shown to be integral parts of an extrusion press, and since such a press is unquestionably included within the congressional definition of what constitutes a machine tool, the protests were sustained as claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

F. B. Vandegrift & Co. v. United States
41 Cust. Ct. 300 (U.S. Customs Court, 1958)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 Cust. Ct. 255, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protests-99626-k-of-august-f-stauff-co-cusc-1945.