Protests 995161-G of Hollander Bead & Novelty Corp.
This text of 10 Cust. Ct. 356 (Protests 995161-G of Hollander Bead & Novelty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the articles in question are in imitation of precious or semiprecious stones composed wholly or in chief value of glass, similar in all material respects to the merchandise covered by Abstract 47109, and in view of the further stipulation that they are not composed in any part of synthetic resin or ivory, that they do not imitate pearls, and are not imitation pearl beads, the merchandise was held dutiable at 25 percent under paragraph 1503 by virtue of T. D. 49458, as claimed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
10 Cust. Ct. 356, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protests-995161-g-of-hollander-bead-novelty-corp-cusc-1942.