Protests 991991-G of Zwiebel

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 991991-G of Zwiebel

4 Cust. Ct. 393

United States Customs Court·Decided February 7, 1940·No. No. 43206·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Brown, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is composed in chief value of blown glass in the form of grape clusters and sprays and that they are constructed of materials similar to those contained in the merchandise involved in Woolworth v. United States (G. A. 8427, T. D. 38697) and Baltimore & Ohio v. United States (G. A. 8606, T. D. 39451) and that the issues are similar to those in Abstract 42424. From the record it was found that Abstract 42424 has no application to the merchandise in the case at bar. In the other two cases the articles were held not to be beads. On the record presented the claim at 60 percent under paragraph 1518 as blown glass articles was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Brown, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is composed in chief value of blown glass in the form of grape clusters and sprays and that they are constructed of materials similar to those contained in the merchandise involved in Woolworth v. United States (G. A. 8427, T. D. 38697) and Baltimore & Ohio v. United States (G. A. 8606, T. D. 39451) and that the issues are similar to those in Abstract 42424. From the record it was found that Abstract 42424 has no application to the merchandise in the case at bar. In the other two cases the articles were held not to be beads. On the record presented the claim at 60 percent under paragraph 1518 as blown glass articles was sustained.

Protests 991991-G of Zwiebel, 4 Cust. Ct. 393 (cusc 1940).

Pincite

4 Cust. Ct. 393 (Protests 991991-G of Zwiebel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.