Protests 983924 of Bloomingdale Bros.

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 983924 of Bloomingdale Bros.

3 Cust. Ct. 389

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedSeptember 14, 1939

DocketNo. 42139

StatusPublished

This text of 3 Cust. Ct. 389 (Protests 983924 of Bloomingdale Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Protests 983924 of Bloomingdale Bros., 3 Cust. Ct. 389 (cusc 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of •embroidered motifs, galloons, trimmings, bands, and laces similar to that the subject of Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396) and Normandy lace articles like those passed upon in United States v. Amrein (26 C. C. P. A., 353, C. A. D. 40). The claim at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 was therefore sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of •embroidered motifs, galloons, trimmings, bands, and laces similar to that the subject of Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396) and Normandy lace articles like those passed upon in United States v. Amrein (26 C. C. P. A., 353, C. A. D. 40). The claim at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 was therefore sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Cust. Ct. 389, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protests-983924-of-bloomingdale-bros-cusc-1939.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack