Protests 982354-G of Stern Bros.

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 982354-G of Stern Bros.

1 Cust. Ct. 463

United States Customs Court·Decided November 2, 1938·No. No. 39737·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: (1) knit wool outerwear at 45 cents per pound and 50 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1114, Abstract 16064 followed; (2) filet laces similar to'those passed upon in United States v. Jabara (22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065) at 75 percent under paragraph 1430; (3) embroidered apparel similar to that involved in Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396) at 75 percent under paragraph 1430; and (4) artificial flowers the same as those passed upon in Bobinson-Coodman v. United States (17 C. C. P. A. 149, T. D. 43473) at 60 percent under paragraph 1419.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: (1) knit wool outerwear at 45 cents per pound and 50 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1114, Abstract 16064 followed; (2) filet laces similar to'those passed upon in United States v. Jabara (22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065) at 75 percent under paragraph 1430; (3) embroidered apparel similar to that involved in Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396) at 75 percent under paragraph 1430; and (4) artificial flowers the same as those passed upon in Bobinson-Coodman v. United States (17 C. C. P. A. 149, T. D. 43473) at 60 percent under paragraph 1419.

Protests 982354-G of Stern Bros., 1 Cust. Ct. 463 (cusc 1938).

Pincite

1 Cust. Ct. 463 (Protests 982354-G of Stern Bros.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related