Protests 981951-G of Wo Kee

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 981951-G of Wo Kee

6 Cust. Ct. 638

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedMay 15, 1941

DocketNo. 45841

StatusPublished

This text of 6 Cust. Ct. 638 (Protests 981951-G of Wo Kee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Protests 981951-G of Wo Kee, 6 Cust. Ct. 638 (cusc 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Evans, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in question was held properly classifiable as follows: (1) crude drugs free off duty under paragraph 1669; (2) certain items as drugs advanced at 10 percent ad valorem, under paragraph 34; (3) apricot kernels at 3 cents a pound under paragraph 762; and (4) vegetables prepared at 35 percent ad valorem under paragraph-775. Oy Wo Tong v. United States (5 Cust. Ct. 70, C. D. 372), Abstract 34104, and Quong Yu Wo v. United States (T. D. 48003) followed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Evans, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in question was held properly classifiable as follows: (1) crude drugs free off duty under paragraph 1669; (2) certain items as drugs advanced at 10 percent ad valorem, under paragraph 34; (3) apricot kernels at 3 cents a pound under paragraph 762; and (4) vegetables prepared at 35 percent ad valorem under paragraph-775. Oy Wo Tong v. United States (5 Cust. Ct. 70, C. D. 372), Abstract 34104, and Quong Yu Wo v. United States (T. D. 48003) followed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 Cust. Ct. 638, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protests-981951-g-of-wo-kee-cusc-1941.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack