Protests 981907-G of Sears

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 981907-G of Sears

8 Cust. Ct. 440

United States Customs Court·Decided January 14, 1942·No. No. 46819·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J

In view of the holding in Riley v. United States (8 Ct. Cust. Appls. 116, T. D. 37225), which was recently called to the court’s attention, wherein certain woven woolen spreads used to cover the legs and body in automobiles, on couches, or in carriages were held dutiable as woven blankets, the merchandise in question was held dutiable as manufactures of cotton, not specially provided for, at 40 percent under paragraph 923 as claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J

In view of the holding in Riley v. United States (8 Ct. Cust. Appls. 116, T. D. 37225), which was recently called to the court’s attention, wherein certain woven woolen spreads used to cover the legs and body in automobiles, on couches, or in carriages were held dutiable as woven blankets, the merchandise in question was held dutiable as manufactures of cotton, not specially provided for, at 40 percent under paragraph 923 as claimed.

Protests 981907-G of Sears, 8 Cust. Ct. 440 (cusc 1942).

Pincite

8 Cust. Ct. 440 (Protests 981907-G of Sears) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related