Protests 981907-G of Sears
This text of 8 Cust. Ct. 440 (Protests 981907-G of Sears) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
In view of the holding in Riley v. United States (8 Ct. Cust. Appls. 116, T. D. 37225), which was recently called to the court’s attention, wherein certain woven woolen spreads used to cover the legs and body in automobiles, on couches, or in carriages were held dutiable as woven blankets, the merchandise in question was held dutiable as manufactures of cotton, not specially provided for, at 40 percent under paragraph 923 as claimed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 Cust. Ct. 440, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protests-981907-g-of-sears-cusc-1942.