Protests 979753-G of Bloomingdale Bros.

17 Cust. Ct. 169
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedAugust 12, 1946
DocketNo. 51263
StatusPublished

This text of 17 Cust. Ct. 169 (Protests 979753-G of Bloomingdale Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Protests 979753-G of Bloomingdale Bros., 17 Cust. Ct. 169 (cusc 1946).

Opinion

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

The Government chemist who made the chemist’s report of the sample testified that he found the sample to be composed solely of svnthetic phenolic resin; and that the synthetic resin was not a binding agent. In accordance therewith and following Abstract 49907 the claim at 20 percent under paragraph 1558 was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
17 Cust. Ct. 169, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protests-979753-g-of-bloomingdale-bros-cusc-1946.